PSU Horse Barns Web Project
Dr. Nancy Diehl, Instructor


GRAIN FEEDING SYSTEMS

Stacy Shetler

 

 

Feeding Methods at Penn State:

Figure 1  A single stall grain feeder, mounted to the stall wall for stability, is found at the new horse barns.  The locations of the stall feeders are positioned at opposite corners of adjacent stalls to reduce aggression between horses during feeding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2 Another stall grain feeder at the new horse barns remains on the floor and it is not attached to any walls or to the floor.  This may be a problem for the horse in eating efficiently if the tub is easily movable with chances of tipping over.  In addition, the low position on the ground could increase inhalation of settled dust, bedding, or dirt and stall waste can contaminate feed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figures 3,4 Here is a group tire feeder, which is used out in the paddocks and pastures.   As shown, there is a wooden bottom secured between the two tires to hold the grain as an easy reach for the horses.  A concern with the tires is that the horses may ingest the tire strings that fray from increased usage.  An idea is being tested to invert the tires in order to reduce the amount of tire strings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 5 Grain feeder in conjunction with a hay manger, found at the old horse barns.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 6 Here is a creep feeder found in the Penn State pastures for group feeding unweaned foals.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Research at PSU

Differences in feeding duration due to aggressive competition:

In a study done by graduate student Susan Kress a quantitative comparison of behaviors in different feeding systems was made.  A common problem when feeding horses in groups is the introduction of competition, which is relevant to feed intakes and feed conversion efficiency of growing yearlings.  Her overall goal of completing this research project is to provide equine feeding system recommendations to the public.  Therefore, for the objectives in her study, Susan recorded data that compared agonistic behaviors displayed during group grain feedings on three grain feeding systems: tire feeders, individual tubs on the ground, and manger feeders. (Kress)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Photo courtesy of Susan Kress

Figure 7 Manger grain feeders used for group feedings found out at pasture in a research setting.  Each grain opening is separated by a wooden divider.  This allows individual feeding within a group setting.  People can use similar setups by tying buckets along a fence or by bringing horses into straight stalls.

 

 

Time spent eating during a feeding session in 3 feeder types (2 different groups of yearlings in 2 years):

Year 1: Tire feeders: 19.7637 min

               Individual tubs: 14.9272 min

               Manger feeders: 15.3742

Year 2: Tire feeders: 18.3336 min

               Individual tubs: 11.5675 min

               Manger feeders: 15.4188 min

 

Tire feeders both years had the longest eating duration.  The presumption is that longer eating is better because it appeared that the horses were less “hurried” and had fewer antagonistic interactions.  With the tire feeders a horse responding to an antagonism by another horse could simply move around the feeder rather than have to leave and find a new feeding location.  While horses using the manger feeder would initially settle at a feeder location, certain individuals would soon begin to show aggression toward others and displace them away from their location.  With individual tubs on the ground horses would frequently be displaced away from their tub and feed was often spilled on to the ground.

 

 

 

Technology

A new type of feeder on the market is an automatic feeder.  There are many different models where the feeder can be made of plastic or stainless steel.  No matter the product design, they have the same desired outcome.  The automatic feeder becomes a convenience for the horse owner because it is programmed to dispense the correct amount of food at the correct times of day.  Having smaller amounts of food dispensed during many times throughout the day might help decrease the incidents of digestive problems, such as colic.  The feeder ensures safety to both the owner and the horse because it is mounted on the outside of the stall to reduce horse and feeder contact when feeding, as well as the removal of sharp edges on the feeder itself.  When comparing three companies, there were differences in size and design, battery or electric powered, and price.  Prices can range anywhere from $225-$385.  Not only can these feeders be used for horses, but many can be used for other pets as well, indoor or outdoor.  (iFeed, Nolan Engineering, Agpro)

 

References:

1.      iFeed www.ifeed.com

2.      Nolan Engineering, Inc http://gallery.bcentral.com/Gallery/ProductListing.aspx?GID=4389951&Dept=17843

3.      Agpro Feed right day and night www.profeeder.com/index.shtml

 

 

The content of this web page was produced by students in our Advanced Horse Production and Management (AnSc 407, 2004) course at Penn State. This page is not a product of the Equine Science Team. As such, it is intended for educational and entertainment purposes only. For recommendations specific to your farm or horse you should consult your equine veterinarian, local horse professional or County Extension Agent.

 

Where trade names appear, no discrimination is intended, and no endorsement by Penn State's College of Agricultural Sciences is implied. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension Work, Acts of Congress May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U. S. Department of Agriculture and the Pennsylvania Legislature. T. R. Alter, Director of Cooperative Extension, The Pennsylvania State University.

 

This publication is available in alternative media on request.

 

The Pennsylvania State University encourages qualified persons with disabilities to participate in its programs and activities. If you anticipate needing any type of accommodation or have questions about the physical access provided, please contact Michael O'Connor, 814-863-3913 in advance of your participation or visit.

 

The Pennsylvania State University is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to programs, facilities, admission, and employment without regard to personal characteristics not related to ability, performance, or qualifications as determined by University policy or by state or federal authorities. The Pennsylvania State University does not discriminate against any person because of age, ancestry, color, disability or handicap, national origin, race, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran status. Direct all inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policy to the Affirmative Action Director, The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Willard Building, University Park, PA 16802-2801; tel. (814) 863-4700/V, TDD (814) 865-1150/TTY.